| |||
|
Should I have been more aggressive with more over pair? He could easily have a T here. Thoughts? PokerStars Game #18321129435: Hold'em No Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2008/06/22 - 23:47:13 (ET) Table 'Kajam II' 2-max Seat #2 is the button Seat 1: adam258 ($53.20 in chips) Seat 2: cj_4th ($46.80 in chips) cj_4th: posts small blind $0.25 adam258: posts big blind $0.50 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to adam258 [Jc Jh] cj_4th: raises $1 to $1.50 adam258: raises $3 to $4.50 cj_4th: calls $3 *** FLOP *** [Td 3s Ts] adam258: bets $6 cj_4th: raises $6 to $12 adam258: calls $6 *** TURN *** [Td 3s Ts] [7h] adam258: checks cj_4th: bets $5 adam258: calls $5 *** RIVER *** [Td 3s Ts 7h] [7c] adam258: checks cj_4th: bets $10 adam258: calls $10 *** SHOW DOWN *** cj_4th: shows [5d 5s] (two pair, Tens and Sevens) adam258: shows [Jc Jh] (two pair, Jacks and Tens) adam258 collected $62.50 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $63 | Rake $0.50 Board [Td 3s Ts 7h 7c] Seat 1: adam258 (big blind) showed [Jc Jh] and won ($62.50) with two pair, Jacks and Tens Seat 2: cj_4th (button) (small blind) showed [5d 5s] and lost with two pair, Tens and Sevens |
| |||
|
I actually really like this line. I think villain is doing this with a T or a pocket pair. This line lets you lose the least when he's got a T or a slowplayed pair higher than yours and extracts the most when he has a pair lower than yours.
|