Login
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Reviews
  • Videos
  • Blogs
  • Forums
  • Tools
  • Bonuses

Go Back   PokerTrikz Forums > No Limit Hold Em > Full Ring

Reply

 

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2009, 03:47 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 11
Default [50nl] plan on flop w/ JJ on Qxx against 2.5psb stack opponent (3 bet pot)

$0.25/$0.5 No Limit Holdem
8 players
Converted at weaktight.com

Stacks:
UTG ($64.20)
UTG 1 ($21.95)
MP1 ($29.55)
MP2 ($27.70)
CO ($36.15)
Hero (BTN) ($51.40)
SB ($29.50)
BB ($18.00)

Pre-flop: ($0.75, 8 players) Hero is BTN

1 fold, UTG 1 raises to $1 ($20.95), 3 folds, Hero raises to $3.25 ($48.15), 2 folds, UTG 1 calls $2.25 ($18.70)

Flop: ($7.25, 2 players)


UTG 1 checks ($18.70), Hero ? ($48.15)


If I put the UTG+1 on the following range
QQ-99,AKs-AJs,AKo-AQo,KQs

what will be your plan? UTG+1 has about 2.5 pot size bet left.
assume UTG+1 will shove QQ, AQ if we bet. UTG+1 should call with all underpair, probably AKs depend on our bet size.

While UTG+1 is not so solid, so i think my range is not accurate, but overall how u guys feel about the ranges if consider UTG+1 is a half-decent less than 50bb stack player.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2009, 04:03 AM
postoakpoker's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 533
Default

the fact that he minraised pretty much indicates that he's not a good player. your range is wayyyy off for him. his range includes a lot of lower pocket pairs and possibly some suited connectors and random hands. it's hard to say what I would put villain's range at if he was competant, but if he was competant he wouldn't be a shortstack and he wouldn't be minraising in EP. If he was fullstacked and he made a normal raise and flatted your 3b, I'd probably put him on 88 or 99-JJ and AQ+.

cbet this here all day long. make it ~$5.
__________________
Poker Blog: http://tworags.com/home/postoakpoker
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2009, 04:39 AM
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Akron, Ohio
Posts: 1,952
Default

I bet $5.50. I like my hand, but I'm also not going to get married to it. I might call one raise on the flop, but if he check/raises turn or river I'm dumping hand. If he check/calls flop, I'm betting turn for value. If he check/calls turn, I'm probably checking back river, though depending on board texture I might even value bet again.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2009, 05:05 AM
no eff eks's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: keep f***ing that chicken
Posts: 1,137
Default

bleh, thought this was $25nl so what I said made no sense.... Since it's 50nl, um, basically what Trikkur said.

Last edited by no eff eks; 02-11-2009 at 05:07 AM. Reason: rogged!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2009, 11:37 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 400
Default

I kinda disagree with Trikkur when he states:

"I'd bet 5,50$ on the flop and might call 1 raise on the flop."

If you call that raise , you have to get it in no matter what card comes on turn because villain will almost have no money behind.

On the other hand, I dont really see a way to play this hand without getting the money in seeing villain only has 2,5 x pot left.

I'd check behind on flop and see if he bets turn big/small or checks.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2009, 12:30 PM
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Akron, Ohio
Posts: 1,952
Default

Yea I didn't pay enough attention to stack sizes. Obviously there is no way that I can bet/bet/bet like I mentioned in my post with Villain only have 1/2 stack. Just bet and get it in on the flop. Or bet flop, and figure out what to do on turn card. I'd be willing to get it in a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2009, 01:17 PM
dansiek's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,197
Default

if we show any kind of aggression we are basically forcing ourselves to call, i dont think a check behind is completely horrible here as it may induce a lot of bluffs, however if a K or A comes our hand loses a lot of value.
__________________
Until your opponent gives you a reason to stop exploiting him, keep exploiting him.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2009, 02:23 PM
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Akron, Ohio
Posts: 1,952
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dansiek View Post
if we show any kind of aggression we are basically forcing ourselves to call, i dont think a check behind is completely horrible here as it may induce a lot of bluffs, however if a K or A comes our hand loses a lot of value.
This is also a legitimate play. Check back flop and call turn if he bets. Also if he check turns and it was a blank, you can bet for value, then figure out if you want to shove river for value as well.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2009, 02:29 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by postoakpoker
the fact that he minraised pretty much indicates that he's not a good player. your range is wayyyy off for him. his range includes a lot of lower pocket pairs and possibly some suited connectors and random hands.
aggree

Flop: ($7.25, 2 players)
UTG+1 checks ($18.70), Hero bets $4.75 ($43.40), UTG 1 calls $4.75 ($13.95)

Turn: ($16.75, 2 players)
UTG+1 checks ($13.95), Hero ($43.40)?

the reason that i bet smaller than normal, is i think this opp will probably fold most of the time if he has nothing, at that time i didn't think this opp will have any str8 draw, which was my mistakes (76s is probably within UTG+1 range). when UTG+1 called on the flop, his range becomes narrow down to underpair TT-66 and Q pair..that is how i put, what are u guys think?

if that is the range i put UTG+1 on, then i should not bet on the turn (bet=AI, since we have 1 effective pot size bet left). since worse hands likes TT-66 will still call our bet on river, we didn't lose much value by checking here, and bet the river. TT-66 also don't have many outs to draw to.

take a step backward, if i think UTG+1 calling range on flop is wider, then i should not bet smaller on flop, i should bet bigger on flop, 5 or 5.5, and bet all-in on the turn? bet bigger on flop only drawback is that we might have to call the all-in raise by UTG+1 on flop, if he/she do so.

thanks for everyone's reply. more please
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2009, 02:32 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dansiek
if we show any kind of aggression we are basically forcing ourselves to call, i dont think a check behind is completely horrible here as it may induce a lot of bluffs, however if a k or a comes our hand loses a lot of value.
Quote:
Originally Posted by trikkur
this is also a legitimate play. Check back flop and call turn if he bets. Also if he check turns and it was a blank, you can bet for value, then figure out if you want to shove river for value as well.
+1
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
3 bet pot, 50nl, full ring

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
opponent's stack sizes djgreeny Video Requests 3 09-11-2009 05:44 PM
Trips vs flop minraise: what's your plan? Lambik Micro Stakes 9 07-18-2009 07:51 AM
50NL - QQ in 3-bet pot, dry flop against unknown opponent loicve Micro Stakes 4 09-02-2008 10:24 PM
[10NL] KK on AAT flop against laggy opponent Vantek Full Ring 2 08-20-2008 04:54 PM
50NL - AKo facing 3-bet out of position against unknown opponent loicve Micro Stakes 3 08-13-2008 09:03 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45