
09-03-2008, 06:36 AM
|
 | Senior Member | | Join Date: May 2008 Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 256
| |
At first I thought this could be an incredible easy way to make the most bonuses with the lessest risk, but then I saw that your talking about 2NL. Obviously the rake there is way too low, if there even is rake at all, to get FPP or bonuses.
Despite that, 2NL and 5NL are as far as I know the only low-limits where you can buy-in for 250BB on most sites. beeing deep stacked in a limit full of donks knowing nothing about poker, playing a 4VPIP seems like beeing profitable (but superultrahyper boring lol), but on higher limits, where you only buy-in for 100BB and people at least once in a while be aware of their fold button, the math isn't working anymore.
You can't play 6max profitable without playing some hands. To play tight on micro limits is surely a winning approach, but playing 4% of hands is not tight, it's ridicolous. It means your bleeding chips away, just to win sometimes big ones, most of the time medium sized ones, and sometimes your going to stack off to a suckout. I doubt your winnings could make up much your BB/SB...and the fact that nobody gets it in anywhere in a hand against a 4VPIP player without having the nuts.
And of course what colossus said is true, you don't learn poker by playing AA/KK all the time.
Overall I honestly wouldn't recommend that style. Furthermore, I would suggest to start playing poker at 10NL if your bankroll is high enough and if you'd like to learn a bit more, because the playmoney feeling of the 2NL/5NL limit at least decreases somewhat. I played 2NL/5NL too, but i never took something from it (despite a relatively decent amount of money, due to the deep stack idiot-poker).
|