| |||
|
Villain has been very passive, but no certain hands come to mind.... Hand #1664012714000425: Paris (6-max) 12714 Seat 1: whop*** (15.97 in chips) Seat 2: Tool*** (10.24 in chips) Seat 8: jk5454 (10.15 in chips) Seat 9: oldt*** (9.55 in chips) Tool***: posts small blind $0.05 jk5454: posts big blind $0.10 Dealt to jk5454 [ As Ad ] oldt***: folds whop***: folds Tool***: calls jk5454: raises to $0.30 Tool***: calls @@@ F_L_O_P @@@ [ Ts 8c 7s ] Tool***: checks jk5454: bets $0.60 Tool***: raises to $1.80 jk5454: folds Tool***: returns uncalled bet $1.20 *** SHOW DOWN *** Tool***: mucks Tool*** wins $1.75 |
| |||
|
I agree with said above. But here's your notes come to play to, if you saw this guy doing it before with nuts, then there's no need to peel off, or if you have notes that he repops the bet with flush draw, then go ahead and peel. But fold to strong bet on the turn, unless A comes, then just shove. He has s8 not that often for you to make this step. |
| |||
|
Am I the only one who hates the call/reevaluate turn line ? There are sooo many bad turn cards that we'll have to fold nearly every time if he bets out again. I think this is a raise/get it in or fold situation. What you do is villain dependant though. If he plays draws fast you have to raise and get it in but if he's passive as was stated in the OP, he would probably C/Call with a draw so when he raises it's AT LEAST a combo draw, which is often a favorite against AA. Folding here is correct IMO against this type of villain.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |