| ||||
|
Villain is 71/21/1.8 over only 14 hands. Anyone think he check calls 2 streets to turn his hand into a bluff on any river scare card or is this donk shove for value most of the time? In hindsight my turn bet size really should've been bigger I guess. Absolute/UB Cereus No-Limit Hold'em, $0.10 BB (6 handed) - Absolute/UB Cereus Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com Button ($18.58) SB ($15.74) Hero (BB) ($11) UTG ($7.09) MP ($3.53) CO ($10.59) Preflop: Hero is BB with 9 , 9![]() 4 folds, SB raises to $0.20, Hero raises to $0.70, SB calls $0.50 Flop: ($1.40) 8 , 4 , 3 (2 players)SB checks, Hero bets $1, SB calls $1 Turn: ($3.40) 7 (2 players)SB checks, Hero bets $2.60, SB calls $2.60 River: ($8.60) K (2 players)SB bets $8.60 Total pot: $8.60 |
| |||
|
Easy fold, you have a bluff catcher and that is it and I don't see a call being correct enough times for it to be profitable. BTW I think your bet sizing was fine, maybe bet a little more on the turn but I certainly don't hate it. |
| |||
|
I think checking the turn with the intention of calling all river bets is pretty bad. Bet the turn to get value from his marginal hands since the river is generally gonna be pretty ugly, and by keeping the initiative on the turn makes it more likely villain will check the river unimproved.
|
| |||
|
I am basing this on the information given by the only player there at the table I just don't see how you get more value from worse hands on a drawy board by checking the turn and calling any river bet when there are a lot of scare cards both for you and for your opponent. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |