Login
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Reviews
  • Videos
  • Blogs
  • Forums
  • Tools
  • Bonuses
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-07-2009, 04:22 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 212
Send a message via AIM to juvydriver Send a message via Yahoo to juvydriver
Default

Thanks for all the responses. I checked behind b/c I felt like he may have been slowplaying a set since it's such a popular line at this limit or something like JJ.

He, of course, showed up with 9d 8d.
__________________
Cake: juvydriver
Stars: juvydriver
Bodog: juvydriver
I play the occasional freeroll on FT...also as juvydriver
Currently grinding at $4NL and $10NL mostly on Cake
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-07-2009, 07:42 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 466
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by no eff eks View Post
His stack is too big compared to the pot to assume he's calling a shove with worse. Maybe betting small is okay, and that's probably what I'd do, but shoving is extremely marginal possibly even -EV.
If you think I'm not capable of value betting thin you might want to watch some of my videos.
I never said anything about shoving. Anyway, it seems that you agree we should value bet and that's that.

I'm also not saying you're not capable of value betting thin but judging from the fact that you want to check behind in a clear valuebet spot lead me to believe you're losing value on rivers.

Don't see this as me coming after you, I'm just criticizing your decisions and there shouldn't be anything wrong with that. We're all here to help each other out, right?
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-08-2009, 07:13 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 152
Default

Value bet the river, even if the Q helped him he isn't going to be CRing you for value if he shows up with something like QJs, he will just c/c but there are definitely more hands in his range that he will c/c with that are worse rather than better than your hand range.

ShoveOrFold's advice of "shipping the river" should be disregarded.

btw the flop mdb (min donk bet) is either going to be a fd, like bottom/mid pair no kicker or a monster like a set but he would have c/r the turn for value with a set so this time it was either one of the weaker hands.
__________________
Back to winning
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-08-2009, 11:29 AM
AdrienD's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Pokerstars
Posts: 253
Send a message via Skype™ to AdrienD
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by juvydriver View Post
I checked behind b/c I felt like he may have been slowplaying a set since it's such a popular line at this limit or something like JJ.
For a valuebet to work you don't have to beat every single hand from his range, you only need to beat more hands (that can call a bet) than hands that beat you.
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-08-2009, 11:19 PM
no eff eks's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: keep f***ing that chicken
Posts: 1,137
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdrienD View Post
For a valuebet to work you don't have to beat every single hand from his range, you only need to beat more hands (that can call a bet) than hands that beat you.
Not true. For a value bet to work he has to call with more hands that you beat than hands that beat you.

There are many many cases where you will almost always have the best hand, but a value bet would be pure spew.
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2009, 01:04 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 82
Default

how is it both spew and a value bet?

Value Bets as I understand them are +EV by definition. If your bet stands to lose more money than it makes its no longer a value bet and something else altogether....ATM bet maybe since anyone who calls gets to make a withdrawal from your account?
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2009, 01:27 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Notts, UK.
Posts: 1,201
Send a message via Skype™ to ThatDeviant
Default

He means the times where you have the best hand almost always but value betting is pointless because the times you do get called (rarely) you'll only be getting called by better hands.
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2009, 08:39 AM
AdrienD's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Pokerstars
Posts: 253
Send a message via Skype™ to AdrienD
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by no eff eks View Post
Not true. For a value bet to work he has to call with more hands that you beat than hands that beat you.

There are many many cases where you will almost always have the best hand, but a value bet would be pure spew.

well duhhh.. I thought that was kind of obvious.

anyway I think a valuebet is not even thin here and if you don't vbet this you're giving up a lot of value. Whenever I see someone check behind 10 10 here I make a note so next time that he does bet this river its very polarized towards very strong hands or bluffs so I can call with bottom pair and own you (except if I believe you would never 3barrel bluff but then im just donkbetting every river).
Anyway the fact that villain DIDN'T raise flop or turn and DIDN'T donklead river makes sets alot less likely and 9x or weaker alot more likely.
After seeing him limp-call PF and min donkbet flop we can assume he isn't that much of a player and most likely won't fold flopped top pairs and that is why I would open shove this river (isnt that much of a overbet and fish don't care anyway)
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2009, 10:01 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 322
Default

I am am confused as to why some people think a value bet is thin here.

If he has a Queen, chances are that he will lead out, not check raise or check call.
If he has a 9, especially A9, he is calling all day long.
If he had a heart draw, he wasn't calling anyways, so you lose no value.

The only had that I see that beats us is AhQh or maybe a Qh9h. There are a ton of draws/9's that we beat that he will call with.
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2009, 10:35 AM
no eff eks's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: keep f***ing that chicken
Posts: 1,137
Default

lol @ all you guys acting like this is an easy value bet with TT. Considering his stack size betting here is extremely awkward. If he stacks off we're almost always beat, but even a small value bet commits us to the pot.

Maybe you guys should think a little bit before mindlessly betting just because you're ahead of their range.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Spot w KK juvydriver Micro Stakes 4 04-15-2009 05:52 PM
88 weird spot JNuey Small Stakes 3 12-06-2008 03:12 PM
Tricky spot with AA Richy47 Micro Stakes 10 11-02-2008 12:43 AM
99's in though spot RnoTheKing Micro Stakes 5 08-10-2008 11:31 AM
50 NL - odd spot with KK Belwar Micro Stakes 8 03-06-2008 08:11 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45