| |||
|
In general, how do you guys plan your sizing postflop? Let's disregard board texture for this discussion. In general, how do your %pot bets differ from flop to river? I usually bet smaller on the flop and bigger on the subsequent streets because my betting range gets stronger with every street. But often I can't shove the river without making a very significant bet on the turn. Is the saved money on the flop worth making big bets on the turn and river? Would like to hear an argument for betting large on the flop and smaller on turn and river. Some maths would be nice. Hopefully we can get a nice theory discussion going |
| ||||
|
I like to build the pot early (especially ip) so the leverage of my bets get bigger. If the pot is bigger the decisions become more important and since I think, that I make better plays than my opponents, it's a good choice to build bigger pots. I played "small ball poker" for quite a long time, but changed it now because of these kind of thoughts. Edit: And yes, I have to balance that with checking behind trash-hands vs strong opponents.
__________________ It's over now it's unbelievable I just feel like a diamond on a crown I'm so happy it's unbelievable Now - I just feel newborn -- EMIL BULLS FTW |
| ||||
|
I plan betsizing pretty much the same as you except that I often catch myself betting bigger on the flop with strong hands in order to get it in on later streets without overbetting too much. I also tend to bet way bigger on the turn when im going for value than when I'm (semi-)bluffing but thats mainly due to the level of competition (ie. non-betsize-reading nuubs) |
| |||
|
I don't see how we can discuss betsizing in a vacuum since it should depend on board texture, opponent tendencies, hand strength, etc? But in general, if possible, I don't change my betsizing at all unless that interferes with my plan for the hand. For example, if I could get it in by the river by betting 3/4 pot on every street then I would choose that betsizing almost every time. |
| |||
| Definitely not when playing with competent players.
|
| ||||
| Quote:
One example: Many taggish regs love to float boards like K63rainbow and call any Cbet with a small pp - but they give up, if you bet again on the turn. Here it's obviously better to bet more on the flop and less on the turn than vice versa. By betting larger early we threaten a larger part of villains stack (so we build up more pressure) - and many taggish regs don't want to get it too much money with medium strength hands. Of course you should adjust your bet sizing to your opponents-tendencies, but in general I tend to bet around 3/4 pot on the flop.
__________________ It's over now it's unbelievable I just feel like a diamond on a crown I'm so happy it's unbelievable Now - I just feel newborn -- EMIL BULLS FTW |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| theory question about floating | couriermike | Micro Stakes | 5 | 02-25-2009 12:19 PM |
| Theory: Betsizing in a multiway pot with a sidepot | henku | Micro Stakes | 9 | 12-08-2008 06:32 AM |
| General theory: One caller, turn's the flush. | nawhead | Micro Stakes | 4 | 11-29-2008 10:37 PM |
| Basic theory: raises and reraises with? | boz86 | Micro Stakes | 12 | 09-30-2008 07:24 PM |
| First post, I'd like to make it a theory question! | throwfar | Small Stakes | 2 | 04-25-2008 03:36 AM |