Login
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Reviews
  • Videos
  • Blogs
  • Forums
  • Tools
  • Bonuses
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010, 11:57 AM
podbelski's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Russia, Moscow
Posts: 1,867
Default NL50: two hands with a fish

Not much hands were played, like 20. Final stats are 33/15/3.0 fwiw.

First hand was JJ, I think it was 2nd orbit, and I decided to give up and look forward for better spots. One orbit later, same spot, AT hand - caught her bluffing.

Please comment on 1st hand if you don't like my play. Another question - suppose AT hand were played before JJ, does this affect your decisions and how?


Hand 1:
Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (5 handed) - Full-Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com
saw flop

SB ($19.75)
BB ($37.55)
UTG ($51.50)
MP ($44.95)
Hero (Button) ($50.70)

Preflop: Hero is Button with J, J
2 folds, Hero bets $1.25, 1 fold, BB calls $0.75

Flop: ($2.75) 2, 7, A (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $1.85, BB raises to $3.70, Hero calls $1.85

Turn: ($10.15) 10 (2 players)
BB bets $8, Hero folds

Total pot: $10.15 | Rake: $0.50



Hand 2:
Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (6 handed) - Full-Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com
saw flop | saw showdown

Button ($106.95)
SB ($20.25)
BB ($41.75)
UTG ($51.50)
MP ($30)
Hero (CO) ($84.45)

Preflop: Hero is CO with 10, A
2 folds, Hero bets $1.50, 2 folds, BB calls $1

Flop: ($3.25) 10, 7, 9 (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $2.50, BB raises to $5, Hero calls $2.50

Turn: ($13.25) 3 (2 players)
BB bets $35.25 (All-In), Hero calls $35.25

River: ($83.75) Q (2 players, 1 all-in)

Total pot: $83.75 | Rake: $3

Results below:
BB had 7, Q (two pair, Queens and sevens).
Hero had 10, A (one pair, tens).
Outcome: BB won $80.75
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010, 05:50 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 130
Send a message via Yahoo to MOJO_ERASER
Default

yah u just gotta remember over a long run you will win these more times than him....... Its why you play with a good bankroll strat and why you can not do this when you lose when you had the best hand. There is a amount of luck to holdem obviously but skill will out weight luck obviously 10 fold in the longrun
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010, 06:12 PM
Nostalgica's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 300
Default

Both hands look good to me, though a check on the first is "okay" too. I do not think it is bad as it is +EV and not clearly better than checking. I'd be keener on checking with Jh.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010, 08:12 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 999
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nostalgica View Post
Both hands look good to me, though a check on the first is "okay" too. I do not think it is bad as it is +EV and not clearly better than checking. I'd be keener on checking with Jh.
Interesting because in theory, you do want to check the Jh back more often, but in practice does it (in your experience) make a difference? Not to me at least, but I imagine it's because this spot comes up infrequently.

I would bet the A-high flop as a default vs fish, though, and fold when I'm raised. With AT on the turn I'd feel forced to call but in all honesty a fold is better even with top two pair.

On the second board, this is an overbet we can call off. Plenty of draws in his range and he's c/r'ed us before. I would 3-bet the flop if I were you, though.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-16-2010, 02:51 AM
Nostalgica's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 300
Default

I do think cbetting with JJ on Axx is profitable because it's a hand that is difficult to play profitably OOP, but ATC with outs is profitable to cbet on such a board generally, but JJ with Jh has more equity vs a flush draw or even a better made hand that you are less afraid of seeing showdown, not to mention you have one out if villain has a flush draw. In theory you want to check some % of your underpairs in this spot, and JJ with Jh is better to check with because you are rarely double barreling flush turns so the Jh is not helpful for a cbet that sets up a double barrel, but does give you more equity vs check backs and/or check/call situations.

I do agree, however, that it does not matter often. I think cbetting 100% or check/deciding mostly are both okay, but lean towards betting without reads. I think it's a bit crass to write of checking completely as we DO have showdown value and calling down is not unprofitable necessarily.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-16-2010, 03:39 AM
kgu1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 100
Default

Hand #1: I think you played it pretty standard. Just because an overcard comes should never mean that you give up your underpair. You don't want to check and give villain a chance to take control of the hand.

Hand #2: Standard as well. Min raise here could mean a number of things such as KT, QT, combo draw, etc.
__________________
Whether he likes it or not, a man’s character is stripped at the poker table; if the other players read him better than he does, he has only himself to blame. Unless he is both able and prepared to see himself as others do, flaws and all, he will be a loser in cards, as in life.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-16-2010, 05:41 AM
podbelski's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Russia, Moscow
Posts: 1,867
Default

ok thanks a lot, but if the first hand played vs her was AT, and JJ came 2nd, do you change your line?

For AT, I think turn decision becoming more close cause I don't know anything about opp's tendencies yet... Maybe in this case 3betting the flop is better?

And, assuming we somehow folded (or maybe not) the AT hand, and hit those jacks later, do you still think cbetting is as good as checking, or should I prefer the latter?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NL50: some hands podbelski Micro Stakes 12 11-08-2010 06:31 AM
2 3-way pots with 1 reg and 1 fish with big hands given1982 Small Stakes 7 03-10-2009 08:16 AM
Nl50 - Two hands Tsorp Full Ring 2 01-02-2009 07:37 AM
NL50: 40 hands vs TAG wrap_it Heads Up 2 11-03-2008 07:03 PM
Nl50: overpair facing lots of fish-action wrap_it Micro Stakes 3 10-23-2008 06:04 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45