| |||
| Quote:
|
| |||
| I keep seeing this all over the place. Is it more profitable to start with SNGs or with uber-micro like 4NL with a roll like 50-100$ ?
|
| |||
|
I play alot of sitngo's and cashgames and you really cant compare both games. I can honestly say that I am more succesful in sitngo's than in cashgames. If I would play in cashgames like I would in sitngo's I'd definetly be a winner in cashgames but it is for me much easier to disconnect myself from the money in a sitngo. For example: If I know someone is bluffing in a sitngo , I'll push all in and I know he'll fold. This I dont do in cash games and I tend to fold there giving up a nice pot. Also c-betting a missed flop in a sitngo is for me easier than in a cashgame because I dont lose any money in a sitngo if 3-betted or called. With a bankroll of 50$-100$ I'd play the 1$ and 2$ buy in sitngos to build a little bigger bankroll and than try out the microlimits cashgames. But it is probalby dependent from person to person. With such a small bankroll it is easier to build it in the cashgames but it is also easier to lose it. Your choise. Colossos |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |